Coastal TIF requires close assessment
By Carlos Guerra
San Antonio
Express News
San Antonio Express-News
March 30, 2000
Coastal TIF requires
close assessment
By Carlos Guerra
Section: Metro / South Texas
Edition:
Metro
Page: 1B
Estimated Printed Pages: 2
Index Terms:
Column
Article
Text:
There's a reason for being cautious before making a wish.
Corpus
Christi's City Council voted last week to create a tax increment financing (TIF)
district to raise one-third of the $30 million North Padre Island Storm Damage Reduction
and Environmental Restoration Project.
Most of the cash will pay for dredging
Packery Channel, a canal through Padre Island's loose sands from Laguna Madre to
the gulf, and dumping the dredged sand on nearby eroded beaches.
Proponents
say this could double tourism while improving circulation of Laguna Madre waters.
But
detractors say it will increase the ferocity of storm surges, just so some underdeveloped
real estate will skyrocket in value.
Neither TIFs, authorized by the Texas
Legislature in 1981, nor this project is a novel idea.
Packery Channel is
a natural waterway that has now been silted shut, as it has many times before, by
winds and currents. But if boat traffic on the tenuous waterway has stopped, investment
and speculation on the land along it have not.
In 1999, voters rejected a
tax increase to dredge it, so city officials now say a TIF is the cost- and risk-free
way of doing it.
Since few TIFs - which do not require voter approval - have
been tried, few understand how tax increment financing works - or its perils.
This
may explain why they are becoming increasingly popular with developers and local
officials looking to stick a tax-weary public with high-dollar capital projects.
There
have been good TIFs that revitalized decaying neighborhoods, built industrial parks
and produced net tax gains. But TIFs have also funded huge projects that did little
more than enrich a few handfuls of insiders.
TIFs only work well when the
improvements they fund increase surrounding property values so rapidly that the additional
property tax revenue - or "tax increment" - quickly retires the debt incurred
for the improvement. This added revenue is then funneled to the participating jurisdictions
to pay for the costs that are seldom mentioned in the sales pitches.
First,
a TIF district is defined geographically and property tax revenues within it are
frozen. Participating taxing bodies agree to freeze collections on TIF property and
forgo all additional taxes until the TIF's bonds are retired.
But are TIFs
really cost free?
Put a pencil to each one before deciding. The Packery Channel
TIF, as presented, prompts some very serious questions.
A navigable Packery
Channel will almost certainly increase surrounding property values.
But remember
that increased human or economic activity also swells the demand for public services.
More people and pricier property will mean more police, fire and health costs, and
greater infrastructure expenses.
If the increased tax revenues from higher
property values are paying off the reason for the values rising - instead of the
costs of additional public services - taxpayers who are not in the TIF zone will
make up the difference, either through higher taxes or diluted services.
Also
remember that construction is seldom the only cost of big capital projects. Who will
pay the maintenance and perpetual redredging of a canal through sands naturally prone
to silting?
Finally, if the city, county and college district's TIF sells
"risk-free" non-recourse bonds that leave all the risk on bondholders,
expect to pay junk-bond interest rates. This will lengthen the time before the bonds
are retired and participating jurisdictions can begin collecting increased taxes.
<HR><I>To
leave a message for Carlos Guerra, call ExpressLine at 554-0500 and dial 4410, or
e-mail cguerra@express-news.net.
</I>
Copyright 2000 San Antonio
Express-News
Record Number: 481492